NODA Reports

Beauty and the Beast 2026

Date:13th February 2026
Society:Melksham Music & Drama
Venue:Rachel Fowler Centre, Melksham
Type of Production:Pantomime
Director:Jake Clifford & Joeanne Londors
Musical Director:Ali Turrell
Choreographer:Katie Mence, Penny Smart, Brad Doman & Aurelia Karczewska.

Reviewed by by Bob Allen, NODA SW District 14 Representative

Always worth the trip down to see this very good group and always a very
warm welcome – so thanks to everyone. I’ve recently seen several
versions of Disney’s Beauty and the Beast so it was with delight I looked
forward to seeing this version which came from the large NODA collection
of scripts to hire. Here was a slightly different story which was well suited
to the talents of this group. The Pantomime was sold out for each
performance which is such great news for a small group and justifies all
the work put into it.


This was a very well constructed show. Put together with thought and
care by Joeanne and Jake. Their attention to detail, pace and energy was
great for a first joint effort into the difficult world of Pantomime. Given the
acting space and it’s confines it was a labour of love but one that was
worth the effort. The cast were all good in their roles and bonded well as
a group – each supporting each other. The acting was ever present even
in the mass cast scenes. Such a good job done that I think I will not
mention individual roles. I loved the way that no one person stole the
spotlight even with a very good “Baddie”. There were some small really
good actions performed throughout the show – a stolen kiss here, the
aside look there. All cast members were on stage and acting! Well
Done!The set pieces were overall handled well. Scenery was good but
modest as space allowed. Costumes were good, as always, and it was
great to see the Beast well dressed. The Dame was very well dressed
considering the family were supposed to be very poor at the time. The
transformation scenes set on the stage side were well handled and very
smoothly performed.


It is well to remember that an audience for Panto is a mixture of many
ages so that there is not a need for musical numbers to be current and
older tunes could be acceptable. Some of the music choices flew over my
head but I did enjoy “Looking for me”, “Love doesn’t stand a chance” &
“Everybody”.


The scene at the Beauty salon was a hoot and gave a very unexpected
boost to the show. I would have liked to hear some gentle background
music to help kill the dead spots that occurred, mainly by nerves, but the
whole cast was to be congratulated on a scene well done! I think I would
have enjoyed being a fly on the wall for those rehearsals!

I do have some small suggestions that might have improved the show
even more from my point of view. Firstly each change of scene, that was
so well co-ordinated with cast and crew, went to a standard pattern. Dim
lights, add music, move scenery & props, off with music, off with lights,
cast arrives in darkness. From the audience view I wish the music had
just continued until all the cast were in place and lights came up. This
would have made the change seem quicker and smoother. Less obvious.
I would also suggest that for any future Pantomime more thought is given
to the first appearance of the Dame. He did seem to have some nerves on
his entrance and had to share the space with two of his daughters. This
meant that every time he moved across the acting area the two ladies
had also to move to another space and it all looked slightly messy.
I always suggest that it is important for the Dame to strike up a
relationship with the audience by having some “me too” time with them.
On first entrance get the Dame to do the talking on her own and
really bond with the audience – always works.

Loved the way the comedy was woven into the script throughout the
show, with plenty of examples used by various members of the cast.
Spreading the laughs around the cast really gave a unity to the show and
some weight to the script besides giving more cast the chance to earn
some laughs.


My Sincere Thanks to MMAD for another great enjoyable show. I know the
next presentation will be totally different but I cannot wait to come down and visit again.

Treasure Island 2025

Date:15th February 2025
Society:Melksham Music and Drama
Venue:Rachel Fowler Centre, Melksham
Type of Production:Pantomime
Director:Penny Smart
Producer:Geoff Mitcham

Reviewed by Bob Allen, District 14 Representative, Southwest Region

First Visit to a group that has been well recognised by NODA and my first visit to a former Chapel, nestled behind the centre of old Melksham. This group rehearse and stage their productions in this space which is determined by the difficult layout. The chapel has an upper level (not used) which makes for a low acting area underneath. The audience were seated across the floor facing a long wall which then controls the acting area. No rear room for scenery and only exits left and right for all actors and scenery. And the real crowning glory was coping with an original cast metal support pole in the centre of the acting width! However the area seats about a hundred patrons who are used to the width and depth of the “stage”.There is a small rig for lighting above the seating area.and the acting area was as well lit as possible. I mention all of this, which perhaps you have heard before on these reports, but I wanted to make clear what an achievement any production is under these conditions – let alone a show this successful!


A Pantomime has a lot of expectations from the public especially when it is not one of the traditional panto choices. This group chose a script of Treasure Island by Ben Crocker. Not the strongest story line but the cast milked the words for all their worth. Although I will mention some of the main parts later this was truly an ensemble show. Everyone supported each other, especially when the odd “fluff” happened and all the cast worked so well together in the very tight space. The cast were really into their roles and kept in character even when on the edge of the acting area. Everyone interacted with the audience as they came and went which all helped to build the rapport. This bonding, between cast, crew and audience made the show a success as far as I am concerned.


Costumes play a big role in Pantomime. Here we had wonderful period pirates and quite modern W.I. dressed ladies. The two types of costume didn’t originally gel with me, especially as all the women wore “fascinators” which must reflect those women of a certain age in Melksham! However I could appreciate that it was a quick and easy way for the audience to identify the different groups on stage. Long John Silver and Mrs Hawkins were really outstandingly good although all the costumes, being well lit, shone on stage. Your costume team did you proud.

The stage crew worked quietly and fast to change scenery. The flat wall was covered by portable flats that rolled in and out as required. They were double sided and had extra layers added with painted hardboard panels. There were a few small wooden “cutouts” posted around as necessary and thewhole area became the Ship Hispaniola for the first scene in Act Two. This was rigged in the intervalamid small children racing about and adults with coffee cups. They are not even blessed with main tabs to cover all of this. Sadly the lighting which was quite even and bright during the scenes did not fade in and out and the sudden plunge into darkness was an area which could be improved. Also I feltthe small spotlights used in the song solos were not necessary as the whole area was so well lit.

Music and dance played a large part in this show. Wow were the cast well rehearsed in these numbers! Everyone was in “sync” as far as I could judge and enjoying themselves. But I ask this question, as the audience were a cross section of the public I wondered if there could have been amore cross generational choice of tunes. I know most of them were new to me but in Panto it’s always good if there are some popular choices to encourage audience participation. The same could be said about the Community Song at end of the show. Something easy, very, very silly and quick is ideal. And preferably on a board visible on stage – even if hand written.


I would like to suggest that in future pantos you raise the music level during scene changes. Your team were good and almost silent but you missed a trick. The audience were ready and waiting to clap along with the Sailor’s Hornpipe as it played during scene changes. They would have not been aware of the scene changes if they were busy clapping!

My first praise must go to Director Penny Smart for all her hard work in staging this show as well as stage managing. She must have been full of energy to have passed that onto the cast or very bossy! Pantomime, because it uses all aspects of drama, is not an easy task to direct, so well done Penny. Also producing the show was a very experienced Geoff Mitcham. I thank them both for their warm welcome and time spent answering my questions.


I would like to mention a few of the cast but make it clear that we are only as good on stage as our fellow actors make us and this was an ensemble piece! Most Important Person – Caroline:  (Prompt) Squire Trelawney – John. Great support role that brought some normality to his scenes Jim Hawkins – Rosie, Jenny Trelawney – Louise. Both worked well together in acting and with the rest of the cast. The Fridge – Hereward – Prize for wearing most false hair so well. Mrs Henderson – Joanne: Such a gem of a part well done! Seadog Sam – Kelly / Seaweed Willy – Karen. Both worked well together and were a good double-act. Polly the Parrot – Carol. Almost forgot this gem of a role. Worked her feathers off to woo the audience and how they loved her. Well done. Long John Silver – Tom. Great bad guy! Loved the way you relished your words but worried over the state of your vocal chords. Eye shadow just right especially when combined with that evil smile. Loved that you loved your role. Well done! Mrs Hawkins – Justin.  Well done Justin on winning the fight with the hardest of Pantomime roles. You are the first bearded Dame I’ve seen. You engaged with the audience from your first line and won them over. Your treatment of the audience men was just right and a good laugh. You were a great Dame.

Thanks to all I saw and met on my visit. I look forward to the next time

Little Red Riding Hood & the Three Little Pigs

Date16th February 2024
SocietyMelksham Music and Drama
VenueRachel Fowler centre
Type of productionPanto
DirectorDonna Ruderman
ProducerJoeanne Londors
ChoerographyKaty Mence & Penny Smart & Brad Doman

Reviewed by Dee Way, District 14 Representative, Southwest Region, and Joy Smith

Thank you for your kind invitation to report on your recent production of this lovely pantomime which combines these two classic stories together around the wolf.  This was a good choice of script for this society as it gave plenty of opportunity for repartee with the audience and played to the strengths of the group.  The jokes were well devised and had some lovely plays on words that were well delivered with good energy and character. This was a truly joyous production, full of fun and laughter, with the cues for audience responses made very clear.

The pantomime was very well planned for the use of the multiple entrances and the scenery changes. The scenery was very effective, including a backdrop of a painted woodland scene, complete with path and toadstools; a hidden door; three houses for the pigs and a campfire.  This scenery worked so well because it was fairly simple, not fussy, and created just the right homespun atmosphere for the show. The idea of dropping the words for the audience song from the balcony worked very well.

The music and lighting were both very good, unobtrusive and on cue. The singing throughout was good, particularly from the lead characters, while the choreography was well suited to the abilities of the cast. The dance between Ursula and Red was very good, and the woodland dance had some really good moves.

The costumes were lovely and inventive, especially for the pigs, with their pink headgear, ears and snouts. Fin looked wonderful in his fancy waistcoat and multicoloured hat, while the wolf was suited in grey with furry ears, hands and feet.  Ursula’s purple dress and stole were perfect for the wicked step-mother, and Will the Woodcutter totally looked the part in his waistcoat, shirt, trousers and boots. 

The Lead Characters:

Will the Woodcutter: a traditional Principal Boy, looking for love, he was amusing in his interaction with Bark and Trunk and had a good romantic partnership with Red Riding Hood.

Red Riding Hood:  an amusing depiction of a traditional Principal Girl, doing good deeds despite her cruel stepmother.  Excellent interaction with other cast members, especially with the Big Bad Wolf and in her song with Ursula and of course a happy ending with Will.

Granny:  had great stage presence particularly in the weight-loss-plan joke, and a good singing voice.  However, this depiction of the Pantomime Dame was somewhat subdued and the performance lacked the boisterous fun and bawdy liveliness the part called for.

Mr. Wolf:  giving a fine depiction of a Pantomime Baddie, he was energetic with fantastic body-language and facial expression.  His duet with Ursula was a high-spot of the show and he built an excellent rapport with the audience.  A most entertaining and talented performance.

Ursula:  wicked stepmother Ursula brought a sinister atmosphere of evil to the panto.  Beautifully portrayed in all facets of her character: facial expression, body language and voice.   An excellent performance.

Fin:  enthusiastic, energetic and lively, he was the motor of the show, keeping up the momentum and fast pace.  Excellent rapport with the audience.  A fine performance.

Bark and Trunk:  a very amusing comic partnership which brought great fun to the show – and also to the raffle draw!  Good performances.

Three Little Pigs:  three great characters with good facial expression and body-language.  Amusing reactions to the Big Bad Wolf especially when he huffed and puffed to blow their houses down. 

Gerald:  was a good foil to gold-digger Ursula.

Jenny:  was good as Gerald’s shop assistant, diversifying the hardware stock and suffering unrequited love for Fin.

Fatman:  amusing in the weight-loss-plan visual joke, together with glamorous characters Marilyn and Sasha.

This was a lovely production of a well written and well devised pantomime, with some excellent lead characters whose energy created a really feisty storyline.  The relationships created onstage between the members of the cast were highly believable, and the action was non-stop, energetic and highly engaging.  The scenery, costumes, make-up, lighting, sound, acting, dancing and singing all contributed to a most enjoyable show. Congratulations!

Joseph and the amazing technicolour dreamcoat

Date14th September 2023
SocietyMelksham Music and Drama
VenueAssembly Hall, Melksham
Type of productionMusical
DirectorJohn Clark
Musical DirectorHannah Drury
ChoerographerKaty Mence & Penny Smart
ProducerGeoff Mitcham
Reviewed by Dee Way, District 14 Representative, Southwest Region, and Joy Smith

Thank you for your kind invitation to report on your production of “Joseph…” which has been so long in coming to the stage.  However, your patience paid off handsomely as this was one of the best productions I have seen of this show.  There was much creativity in the staging and use of repeats of songs that made this a highly memorable show. The use of the script in a more modern setting worked very well, especially with Potiphar’s wife and her flirtation with Joseph, and the cowboy approach to “One More Angel”.  `It is these novel ideas that brought a new energy and verve to the production.

The set was very clever, with the small changes made for the various scenes being very subtle and unobtrusive. The bars of Joseph’s cell were very effective, the camels of the Ishmaelites were lovely and Potiphar’s pyramid and abacus were lovely touches!  I really liked the very authentic Egyptian scenes with the Anubis god figures in the background and the sphinx  – this showed that someone had been to Egypt!  The pit for Joseph, and his being attacked was very well done, with no obvious violence but a good effect.  The only part that might have been developed a little more perhaps was the scene with Pharoah.  He was the master of the known world and a god in his own right, after all.

The costumes were excellent!  They looked authentic and reflected the lack of surplus wealth of the time. The two coats for Joseph worked really well, with the final one being incredibly impressive. I liked that fact that the brothers were all dressed differently, in reflection of their differing characters.  And as for Potiphar’s wife – well, no wonder he was worried!

The music was very good, and complemented the singing well, with some of the awkward rhythms well controlled. The fact that the music was live was a real bonus to the cast, as they could be given time to breath and be expressive. The sound in general was very well handled and the lighting was very effective and on cue.

The choreography was very good and nicely varied, enabling the cast to stay in character whilst moving. Make up and hats and beards were well done and looked the part and hid the identity of the Ishmaelites completely. There was a lot of excellent detail in this production that showed a desire to make the production work well, and the sense of fun pervading the proceedings at times was wonderful!

However, it was the performers in the cast that made this production come alive, as they portrayed the individual characters so well and developed their personas beautifully. The leading characters are commented on below, but everyone in the cast, orchestra and backstage was important in staging the production.

Main Characters:

Narrators:  were well balanced, confident and clear with good voices.  Their partnership was excellent in the way they responded and reacted to each other and to the events portrayed.  Brilliant scene setter and story tellers!

Joseph:  had a superb voice and good stage presence.  He moved well and portrayed a stable and consistent character.  He reacted well with both the other players and with the audience.  His stillness at times was powerful.

Jacob:  played an excellent elder statesman and head of family.  His character was steady and impressive.  His singing was good.

Reuben:  a strong character and an excellent eldest brother of the tribe, particularly in the “One More Angel” song.   Very good voice, very well sung.  Loved his sense of fun!

Potiphar:  a nice portrayal of a miserly rich man, always worried that his wife was unfaithful.  Well sung.

Potiphar’s wife:  a wonderful flirtation bringing a change of mood to the scene as she attempted a determined seduction of Joseph.  Good singing voice.

The Baker and the Butler:  good contrast in characters, the Butler more stately and dignified, the Baker energetic and lively.  Both had very expressive body language – we felt their fear and their hope.

Pharaoh:  an impressive character with good stature, though the characterisation could have been a little stronger.  A good voice that he used well.

Altogether this was a highly enjoyable and unique take on the story of Joseph performed by a committed group of actor singers who formed a very close team.  There were statesmanship, jealousy, hope, fear and power all very well portrayed and infused with a vibrant sense of storytelling.  This was one of your best shows that I have seen. Congratulations to everyone involved! 

Dee Way and Joy Smith

N.B. Please note that these comments solely reflect the view of the Representative and can only relate to the performance seen.

The old woman who lived in the shoe NODA report

Date10th February 2023
SocietyMelksham Music and Drama
VenueRachel Fowler, Melksham
Type of productionPanto
DirectorJoeanne Londors

Reviewed by Dee Way, District 14 Representative, Southwest Region, and Joy Smith

Thank you for your kind invitation to report on your recent production of this pantomime, which tells the tale of a developer who buys everyone out of a village – except the old woman in the shoe. The script is well written and devised, with lots of jokes, puns, and fun with the normal characters. This was a good choice of material for the company as it provided so much opportunity for farcical interpretation and creative presentation.

The scenery and set were vibrant with bright colours and contrasts in depicting the rural village, with villagers in bright coloured costumes. The opening song was well performed and cheerful, with natural voices being quite adequate for the small venue. The scene changes were well done, and well planned, although at times they did form a slight pause in the action. The use of the well outside the Shoe house was very well done, with holes in the flats cleverly used. The kitchen scene was great fun, with plenty of slapstick and misunderstandings creating wonderful havoc.

The music was recorded, and very well edited, with a good selection of songs, many of which I did not recognise but the audience thoroughly enjoyed. The singing was very good, with some lovely solos and duets. The sound effects were on time and added to the fun in many ways. The costumes were lovely: bright, cheerful and appropriate, with plenty of changes for the Dame and the leads.

However, the show focussed on the actors, who all played their parts with enthusiasm and energy – while the forgetful Baron was amazing in handling his mishaps!

Nanny Rose Trellis:  excellently portrayed as a traditional pantomime Dame, jokey and entertaining and with a powerful voice.  She interacted well with both audience and other cast members and her song “I feel like a woman,” sung with male chorus members in drag, was hilarious.  A memorable performance.

Baron Bootblack:  brilliantly portrayed as a wicked Baron (boo, hiss), his laugh-filled attempts to defraud the villagers and become a boot-polish mine owner failed when good overcame evil in true panto fashion.  A “polished” portrayal and great fun!

George Bootblack:  portrayed as boldly standing up to his villainous uncle and thwarting his dastardly con tricks.  His partnership with Alice showed good singing and dancing skills and his kiwi accent was great.

Alice Trellis:  portrayed as a sweet Principal Girl, helpful and good tempered.  Her singing and dancing were entertaining and she was particularly well matched with George.

Arthur Minute:  portrayed as an honest cobbler, rather slow and easily outwitted by smooth-talking customers.  Good delivery of the “Timpsons” joke, showing his amazement at the idea of increasing his range of stock.

Shiny Sam:  portrayed as a shoe-shine boy with very little boot-polish, he had excellent rapport with the audience who responded to his greetings with enthusiasm and laughter.  An enjoyable and amusing performance.

Burt Buckle and Betty Buckle:  portrayed as minor villains, henchmen of the Wicked Baron, Burt was a lively and energetic workman, briskly carrying out orders, while Betty was somewhat bemused and often puzzled.  A good partnership, particularly funny in the slapstick decorating scene.

The Genie of the Boot:  portrayed as a magical character and a force for good, helping to foil the Baron’s evil intentions.  An amusing performance in true panto style.

Farmer Furrow:  portrayed as a laid-back presence in the pantomime, he brought humour to the part with his facial expressions as he wandered around in an unconcerned manner.  The visual joke with the pink pig was good.

Mrs Bun:  was well portrayed as a domineering personality, rather upper class and proud of her importance in village life.

Berry fields, Roughly and Eton:  brought a cheerful, cheeky tone to the pantomime, adding to the fun. Their song “My Brother” was a delight.

As ever with this Society, there was enormous fun had by both cast and audience throughout the evening. It was very engaging to see a different story used as the basis of a pantomime, and with a novel script that told the story clearly and with a good sense of humour. The performance was perhaps slightly short on smooth flow, but this was more than made up for by the energy and fun that was had, and the very good detail in scenery and perfomance. Well done!

Dee Way & Joy Smith

N.B. Please note that these comments solely reflect the view of the Representative and can only relate to the performance seen.

Flint Street Nativity NODA report

Date2nd September 2022
SocietyMelksham Music and Drama
VenueRachel Fowler, Melksham
Type of productionComedy
DirectorsDonna Ruderman and Penny Smart

Reviewed by Joy Smith and Dee Way, District 14 Representative, Southwest Region

Thank you for your kind invitation to report on your production of “Flint Street Nativity”, one of the funniest shows I have seen recently. Taken from real life stories, this was a show for any season, despite it being about the first Christmas. The audience were transported back to primary school days, with adults playing 7-year-old children is captivating in itself, but to also have childlike scenery and props worked beautifully. I also loved the part towards the end where the actors played the children’s parents – this was very effective.

The direction was very good, with well thought out scene changes and continuity for a very well devised script, performed with liveliness and good pace. The themes embodied within the drama were clear: the frictions within a junior school class due to envy, victimisation, bullying, ostracising and dreamers. The stories of the home life problems of certain children were clearly linked to the various characters’ brought home the fact that children see their home life as normal, and carry its effects with them wherever they are – which is a sobering thought!

The simple scenery created a realistic primary school setting for the action, complete with a ‘child’ painted sheet backdrop and a bare Christmas tree in need of decorating. The case with the stick insect was well placed to be seen but not obscuring anyone’s view of the action, while the narrator was sited to the side. The white board was very effective in forming a frame to the main action, with Mrs Horrocks mysterious cupboard door just off-centre stage. The second Act saw the introduction of a ‘quiet corner’ with books, paints, swords and first aid kit – a lovely scenic comment on health and safety!

The music was on cue, with the typical false start, and the plan accompaniment to the carols felt as authentic as the off-key singing and forgetting of words – very difficult to do! Equally, the lighting – and lack of it! – was well timed and reminiscent of school productions. The image of Sticky as a shadow image at the close was lovely! The costumes were suitable and creative: the bar towel used for one of the ‘children’ in place of a tee-towel; the ass with the oversized donkey head and the dressing gown shepherds. These all worked brilliantly.

The props were excellent, down to the stick insect, the star, the map of Sirius and its constellation, the lambs that changed size and the parent’s programmes at the end being printed on while paper (ours were on black.)

However, it was the performances of the cast that created this memorable story, with such clear characters and personalities played with verve. Gabriel wants to play Mary, so ostracises her, Star dreams of being an astronaut, like his ‘uncle’, Herod/Joseph who is bullied by know-it-all Mary and dragged around the stage while waving to his parents, and the innkeeper who fancies Mary were all so well played. Frankincense speaks with a totally believable lisp, the narrator who mangles words and reads with difficulty, and the camel with the hindquarters itch and that sings off-key were so believable.

Altogether this was a very entertaining evening of school time memories – but with a twist. The production showed clearly how much home situations can affect young children in the way that they relate to their peers, Also the play showed how parental attitudes are reflected in their children. It made one think even while laughing out loud at the childish antics of the highly liberated actors. Yet the audience could all identify with the children portrayed. This was brilliant! Many congratulations to all involved!

Dee Way and Joy Smith

N.B. Please note that these comments solely reflect the view of the Representative and can only relate to the performance seen.

We are proud to announce that our production of The Flint Street Nativity was nominated for a NODA award for Best Comedy production 2022. Only 6 shows were nominated out of 160. Though we didn’t win, this is an amazing achievement that demonstrates the hard work, commitment and dedication of our members, and the fabulous direction from the directors Donna Ruderman and Penny Smart. Well done all.

Ali-Baba and the forty thieves NODA report

Date18th February 2022
SocietyMelksham Music and Drama
VenueRachel Fowler, Melksham
Type of productionPantomime
DirectorsAli Turrell and Katie Mence
ChoreographersKatie Mence

Report

Author: Dee Way, District 14 Representative, Southwest Region

Thank you for your kind invitation to report on your recent production of ‘Ali Baba and the Forty Thieves’. This tale from the Arabian nights is a wonderful mix of Eastern splendour and magical caves, exotic costumes and palaces, clear characters and sparkling treasure. As such, this pantomime version of the story was very well suited to MMAD. This was a very cheerful and happy show, where the teamwork of the cast shone through clearly, giving the audience a thoroughly entertaining spectacle full of variety, jokes, ad lib fun and energy. Congratulations!

The staging in the very restricted space in the hall was very well done, with good use made of the balcony and the railings, the exits through the audience and the cave. The scenery was well thought out, with reversable flats, large storage jars, a puppet show, a kebab stall, a series of doors, the stage-side curtain as a cliff and scarves decorating the railings. The costumes were brilliant, suitably Eastern and colourful, with the chains added for the belly dancers and the shoulder pads for the storyteller. Particularly impressive were the Dame’s many amusing outfits, especially the “doughnut” dress, with ‘her’ fabulous hats and wigs, and the excellent accessory of a beard! Mustafa the robber chief, was totally believable in the rich red fabric of his authentic looking outfit and eye-catching rings.  There was a lovely visual joke when Dame and Sharon appeared in identical pink bed-wear emphasising difference in their figures!

The lighting for this production was very good, with the cross-stage triple colour bars used to great effect and the tones of colour giving extra impact to the colourful costumes. The red lighting during the scene change worked very well. The occasional use of the star cloth was lovely, giving a lot of sparkle to the treasure. A special mention is needed for the joy of hearing natural voices on stage, in the dialogue and singing. The backing music was very well prepared and was effective while the singing was very good – even when the Dame was shouting. It amazed me how he could sing so off time and key being the musician he is! The Chorus numbers were lovely, with lots of jazzy movement and variety. One duet between Sofia and Ali Baba was most creative in making use of the balcony pillar.

One of the joys of a small venue is that everyone can see well and can feel involved in the action. The cast here were excellent at interacting with the audience, from the raffle ticket sellers at the beginning to the audience participation song before the finale. The script was very well used – and abused? – to create that intimacy and to keep the audience involved throughout the show. All the characters were very well portrayed and individual, so that one did not know at times where or whom to look at next!

Cinderella NODA report

Date 7th September 2019
Society Melksham Music and Drama
Venue Assembly Hall, Melksham
Type of Production Musical
Director Ali Turrell
Musical Director Hannah Drury
Choreographer Katy Mence & Penelope Taylor
Producer Kevin Hodges

 

Report

Author: Dee Way for Delia Lee

Thank you for your kind invitation to report on your recent 50th anniversary your production of “Cinderella”. The staging for this production was highly inventive and very effective.  The opening village market scene with the young Cinderella was very engaging, the home scene was split into half house and half outdoors while the palace in Act 2 included pillars, steps and a throne.   The change of scene back to the house was slow but the audience were entertained by the live music during this time.   The carriage for Cinderella was beautifully created, running around the hall with flashing lights and creaking wheels while the shoe-trying scene was very nicely played with the various slipper triers acting so differently and made very good use of the split stage.

The script was very good, and suited this company very well.  There were nice touches of reality within the fairy tale, such as starting with a young Cinderella in her home village during a narration by the Fairy godmother – a very colourful scene with excellent freezes. There were some very good characters drawn within the show: Cinderella with attitude, the servant, the prince, the King and Queen, stepmother and two wonderful ugly sisters!  Cinderella and the fairy godmother had some lovely lines and songs that were well delivered and clear, while the transformation scene worked very well indeed.

The music was live, and this gave a great deal of energy to the show as well as creating good continuity. The sound and lighting worked well, with some lovely lighting effects. The costumes were fantastic: the ugly sisters in rose pink and purple dresses, the transformation dress for Cinderella, the king and queen in their finery – and sock suspenders! – and the Prince and his servant in their doublet and hose all looked wonderful.

This production I felt benefited from very good continuity planning, some exceptional acting and singing, and a wonderful sense of fun.  All the characters were believable – even the prince when he was bored of meeting prospective brides